Black Bear vs. Mountain Lion

Posted by on Jan 11, 2013 in Hunting | 0 comments

West arbeitet mit Tests, die von Labors im ganzen Land entwickelt wurden, um die Gesundheitsprofile ihrer Patienten am besten herauszufinden. Umfassende Tests helfen ihr, die Ursachen von Krankheiten anzugehen, was ihr hilft, mit ihren Patienten an der Wiederherstellung, Erhaltung und Förderung der langfristigen Gesundheit zu arbeiten. Wenn Sie mit chronischen gesundheitlichen Herausforderungen konfrontiert sind, oder wenn Sie herausfinden wollen, wie Sie auf natürliche Weise Ihre größten Energieressourcen und Klarheit des Geistes finden können – der integrierte Ansatz von Dr.


Left: Mountain Lion. Right: Black Bear.

Most often when we talk about predators, especially those in the North American mountainous wilderness, we lump black bears and cougars in the same breath. Both are generally considered more dangerous than a coyote or bobcat, but not quite as dangerous as a brown bear…probably a notion justified by sheer size alone. I’ve been very fortunate to have had the amazing experience of harvesting these two predators in recent years, and while the taxidermist is completing the mounts, I paid a few extra dollars to have the skulls cleaned, boiled and bleached (of sorts…not sure of the exact chemical). Yeah, I probably could have messed around with it myself, but that is exactly what I would have created in the process: a mess. Needless to say, I believe it was well worth it.

Obviously bears and cats are classified in two different families, but the differences have never been so glaring as when I began to take a closer look at their skulls. There is a lot to be learned about the differences between the animals, their behavior, and therefore, how to hunt them. The first obvious difference between the two skulls is the length and shape. While the cat’s head is short and compact, the bears head, especially the nasal canal, is much longer. So what? This tells me several things.

SMELL. Bear wins… hands down. There is an old Sioux Indian adage that goes: “The eagle sees a leaf fall in the forest. The deer hears a leaf fall in the forest. The bear smells a leaf fall in the forest.” In looking at the length of the snout, this is no wonder. Quite simply, many more olfactory receptors fit there, as opposed to the cat. And like dogs, having a long snout allows a greater volume of scent to linger in the canal, and for a longer period of time.

BITING. Cougar wins. Now I’m not suggesting that being bitten by a bear would feel good, but using the principal of simple leverage, the cat’s bite would be more efficient. The load (pressure near the front of the jaw) is much closer to the fulcrum (the pivot pt. of the jaw) because of its short snout. This explains how a 100-pound cougar can clamp onto the neck of an 800-pound elk and ride it out to the elk’s demise. In this way, the profile of the cougar’s skull is much like the talons of a raptor.


SIGHT: Cougar wins. Notice the big difference between the size of the eye sockets in the two skulls. Bears have beady little eyes and have long been considered to have poor eyesight. But remember, poor eyesight in the bear world is like good eyesight in the human world.

ROOTING: Bear wins. You can see that not only a longer snout, like that of a pigs, is beneficial in rooting under logs and in holes, but the row of front teeth of the bear actually protrudes forward; much beyond the canines. This also will allow the bear to clip vegetation more efficiently than the cougar.

TAKING A HEAD SHOT: Bear wins. When comparing the profile of the two skulls, look at how the bear’s skull creates a long, gently sweeping arc; all the way from the front teeth to the back of its head. The cougar skull, on the other hand, is much more squared. So what? Imagine being face to face with either, and you just have one bullet. I’d think twice about firing a bullet at the bear’s forehead, because of its curved shape. We’ve all probably heard by now that even a large-caliber rifle round can simply ricochet off the forehead of a bear; now I know how this can be true.


CHEWING: Bear wins. Aside from the longer fangs, the bear’s teeth are very similar to those of humans. Note the molars. As omnivores, humans are equipped to eat both meat and vegetables. The bear is no different. Depending on location, vegetation can be the greatest part of a black bear’s diet.

TEARING: Cougar wins. Upon inspecting the cat, I noticed that the incisors are remarkably like shark teeth, and it lacks true molars. This tells me that cougars more often cut and swallow, as opposed to chewing  like a bear. It also demonstrates how a cougar can cut and tear all the way through the bite, and in most areas of the mouth. This is a well-equipped animal-killing, meat-eating machine.


Both of these predators are well-equipped to take man out in an instant. The good news is, they most often don’t want to; very good news for those of us who hunt where they live. So the next time you have the opportunity to look at the skull of your trophy, take an extra minute. Don’t just dismiss it as a cool knick-knack; learn from it, and carry this knowledge with you to the field. You never know, it might just come in handy some day.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>